SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
R. Raja Rathinam - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 1498 of 2021, CM Appl. 4301 of 2021
Decided On : 08-03-2021




Entitlement to pro rata pension is extended to similarly situated individuals, with mandatory verification of eligibility prior to payment and provision of interest on delayed payments.

Headnote:(A) Pension Rules - Pro Rata Pension - The petitioner seeks relief analogous to previous judgments involving similar circumstances, specifically regarding pro rata pension entitlement post-discharge (para 3) - Respondents ordered to assess similarity with respondents in previous cases and rectify payments accordingly (para 6).

(B) Interest on Delayed Payments - In case of delay beyond prescribed period, interest shall accrue at 7% per annum (para 7).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner claims similar status to other petitioners in prior cases, seeking pro rata pension which was acknowledged by respondents upon satisfaction of prerequisites (para 5).

Findings of Court:
The court directs verification of petitioner's status and timely payment of dues as stipulated (para 6).

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner is entitled to the same pension relief as in prior analogous cases (para 3).

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the right of similarly situated individuals to claim parity in pension entitlements, emphasizing verification prior to the payment of any dues (para 6).

Result: The petition is disposed of as directed, with conditions for payment and verification.

Table of Content
1. hearing procedures and exemption from appearance. (Para 1 , 2)
2. claims regarding pro rata pension based on previous judgments. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. directive to grant pension if similarly placed, with conditions. (Para 6 , 7)
4. order for communication and document submission. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral):

1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

CM APPL. 4301/2021

2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

WP (C) No. 1498/2021

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioner in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner in this petition, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) had been given.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioner(s) within a week.

7. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

8. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top