Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Sujeet Bajaj – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement leads to quashing of fir. (Para 3 , 9 , 11 , 13) |
| 2. court emphasizes importance of parties' consent. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 14) |
| 3. compensation to victim's family considered necessary. (Para 10) |
| 4. fir quashed due to settled disputes. (Para 15) |
| 5. petition allowed and disposed of. (Para 16) |
Crl.M.A.4624/2021 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 920/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction for quashing of FIR No.386/2020, registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Learned APP for State accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and has pointed out that father of deceased, namely, Mr. Ramesh Kumar, who is alive, is not made a party to the present petition.
6. At the oral request of learned counsel for petitioner, Mr. Ramesh Kumar is added as respondent No.4 in the array of parties.
7. Petitioner is directed to file amended memo of parties during the course of the day.
8. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 and with the consent of counsel for parties
A High Court can quash an FIR when there is an amicable settlement between the parties that eliminates the necessity for prosecution.
Amicable resolution of disputes can justify the quashing of FIRs when all parties involved affirm the terms of settlement, rendering further legal proceedings unnecessary.
The court has the discretion to quash FIR and consequent proceedings if the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved and the terms of the settlement have been complied with.
In cases of amicable settlement, a victim's non-objection to prosecution can justify quashing an FIR under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The court retains the authority to quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes, preventing the abuse of the judicial process.
An FIR can be quashed when the parties have settled their disputes amicably, and prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Amicable settlement between parties can justify the quashing of an FIR when there is mutual consent and no objection from the affected party.
A court may quash an FIR when the parties have amicably settled their disputes and continued prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The High Court possesses the inherent power to quash FIRs when the parties have settled their disputes amicably and continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Amicable settlements in criminal matters can lead to the quashing of FIRs if all parties consent and further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
