Back
TASHI RABSTAN, PUNEET GUPTA
Alka Sharma, D/o Sh. P. R. Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Mishra, S/o Sh. Madan Mohan Mishra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Tashi Rabstan, J.
1. Both these Letters Patent Appeals have been directed against the judgment dated 29.10.2021 delivered by the learned Single Judge in SWP No.1447/2017, whereby the learned Single Judge while quashing the communication dated 06.03.2017 issued by the University Grants Commission to the Assistant Registrar (Adm. TE/W), University of Jammu and the consequential orders/communications of the University of Jammu dated 14.03.2017 and 30.05.2017, has held that the University of Jammu has wrongly rejected the claim of writ petitioner-Dr. Rajindra Mishra for his promotion with retrospective effect from 04.08.2009. Consequently, the University of Jammu was directed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner-Dr. Rajindra Mishra for grant of promotion to the post of Professor under the Career Advancement Scheme (for short, CAS) with effect from 04.08.2009 afresh thereby putting him at the relevant place in the seniority list after putting notice to the effected candidates, who have already been promoted under the CAS in the intervening period.
2. Since common question of facts and law are involved in the case and both the appeals have been preferred against the same
The main legal principle established is that UGC Regulations, 2010 have prospective effect and candidates who fulfill eligibility criteria before the enforcement of the regulations can be considered ....
It is not necessary for Selection Committee to give reasons for its conclusion, suffice to state, Supreme Court had given a finding to that effect in cases where the rules do not contemplate so. Ther....
University must implement Screening Committee's promotion recommendation confirming API eligibility pursuant to judicial directions; denial thereafter is arbitrary. Notional promotion granted from el....
Promotion of teachers must relate back to the date of eligibility per UGC regulations, not just the interview date.
Eligibility for promotion under the Career Advancement Scheme requires active service status on the date of consideration, as per UGC Regulations.
Promotions to the post of Professor must comply with U.G.C. regulations requiring eight years of service as Reader, and failure to provide a hearing before annulling promotions violates principles of....
Timely submission of academic qualifications and publications is essential for faculty promotions under UGC regulations; delays in challenges to university decisions can invalidate claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
