IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C. Hari Shankar, J.
MX Media and Entertainment Pte. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Contagious Online Media Networks Private Limited - Respondent
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 106 of 2021, I.As 4338 of 2021 and 4448 of 2021
Decided On : 05-04-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the petitioner and respondent's agreement. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner for enforcing contract. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. analysis of lack of consensus between parties. (Para 6 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. conditions for contractual enforceability require consensus. (Para 9) |
| 5. court observations on the efforts to reach a contract. (Para 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 6. conclusion regarding absence of enforceable contract. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 7. final remarks on dismissal of the petition. (Para 33) |
JUDGMENT
1. Learned Senior counsel for the parties have been heard at length and, with consent, this judgment disposes of O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 106/2021.
Facts
2. The petitioner is incorporated and located in Singapore. It is engaged in the production, development, marketing and distribution of media entertainment content, over its Platform "MX Player" ("the Platform").
3. The respondent produces and develops audio-visual content under the brand names "The Viral Fever ("TVF")", "The Screen Patti (TSP)" and "The Timeliners", among others.
4. Appreciation of the rival submissions would require, in the first instance, a chronological excursion through the various documents executed and exchanged in the present case, thus:
(i) It appears that, since some time earlier, programs of the respondent were being distributed and shown on the petitioner's Platform. On 24th February, 2020, the respondent, under the brand name "The Viral Fever (TVF)" confirmed that it would provide six shows, to be hosted on the petitioner's Platform in 2020-2021. The communication read thus:
"Hi Aaron,
As discussed and confirmed:
TVF will provide 6 shows in 2020-21
All the other clauses remain the same from last time.
All masters will be cleaned/without sponsorship.
Deal Value - 21 cr + taxes
Payment Terms:
35% Advance
65% on Delivery
Look forward to a great partnership.
PS - mark my finance/legal.
@ Megha - pl initiate contract.
Best
Rahul Sarangi
Global Head
Business & Content
The Viral Fever (TVF)"
(ii) As per the petitioner, consequent to an "understanding" arrived at, with the respondent, the respondent forwarded, to the petitioner, an Agreement, dated 18th March, 2020 ("the Agreement"), duly signed by the respondent. The petition seeks to aver that, as the office of the petitioner at Singapore was closed owing to the COVID-2019 pandemic, the petitioner was not in a position to countersign the Agreement and send it back. The undisputed factual position remains, however, that the Agreement was signed only by the respondent. The respondent contends that there was no concluded contract, inter alia for the reason that the Agreement was never signed by the petitioner. The petitioner contends, per contra, that there was. Some relevant features of the Agreement may be noted thus:
(a) The respondent offered, by the Agreement, to grant the right to distribute, the Programs owned by it, to the petitioner, which agreed to acquire the said rights. Clause 2.1.1 of the Agreement granted, to the petitioner, the right to distribute the Programs, on the petitioner's Platform, during their respective distribution periods. "Program(s)" was defined, in Clause 1.1.24, thus:
"1.1.24. "Program(s)" means web shows that being distributed under this Agreement namely as below:
i. Immature-season 2 (Program 1)
ii. Aspirants (tentative title)-season 1 (Program 2)
iii. FLAMES-season 3 (Program 3)
iv. Additionally, there shall be three more web shows (the titles of which shall be collectively decided by the parties) namely (Program 4), (Program 5) and (Program 6) respectively shall be part of this Agreement.("Additional Programs").
Program l, Pr
A valid and enforceable contract requires mutual agreement on essential terms; ongoing negotiations and unsigned agreements do not establish legal obligations.
A contract is not concluded until there is consensus ad idem between the parties.
Section 9 of the 1996 Act cannot be used as a tool to compel the opposite party to pay money to the claimant.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the conclusion of a contract can occur upon the award of work, and non-compliance with tender and contract terms can justify contract terminat....
An enforceable arbitration agreement requires mutual consent evidenced by signed documents; mere communications cannot establish such consent.
The court determined that a contract remains valid unless mutually annulled or replaced, upheld by statutory obligations under the Evidence Act.
The court emphasized the arbitrability of the disputes and the need for the petitioner to seek appropriate reliefs under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the appointed ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.