SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Rajiv Ranjan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. The petition impugns the order dated 27th November, 2020 of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, allowing OA No.708/2020 preferred by the respondent and directing the petitioner to constitute a review Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for consideration of the respondent for promotion to the level of Inspector General (IG), with effect from 1st January, 2020, and to take further steps in accordance with law, preferably before the regular DPC for next batch of officers of IG takes place.

2. This petition came up first before us, yesterday, when the counsel for the respondent appeared on caveat. Though we heard the counsels finally on the petition, yesterday itself but adjourned the matter to today to give opportunity to counsels to answer a legal query made pursuant to the hearing.

3. The Additional Solicitor General (ASG), appearing for the petitioner, on enquiry stated that since the impugned order, the review DPC had not taken place but had no instructions whether the regular DPC for next batch of officers of IG had taken place. However the counsel for the respondent stated that regular DPC for next batch of of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top