Interim awards for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act are only valid when made according to fixed amounts stipulated in the unamended Act; settlements must require claimant acceptance.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through Video Conferencing.

2. The present two petitions have been filed challenging the impugned orders passed by the Presiding Officer, (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi accepting the legal offer made by the insurance company and passing an interim award in terms of the said legal offer.

3. The challenge by the Petitioner/insurance company, in the respective matters, is to the effect that Section 140 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 (hereinafter, `the Act') by which interim compensation could be awarded, stands deleted from the Act by virtue of the amendment brought in by the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 (hereinafter, `the Amendment Act, 2019'). It is further submitted by Mr. Seth, ld. Counsel appearing for the insurance company that under Section 149 (3) of the Act, an award in terms of the legal offer can be passed only if the said offer is accepted by the insured person. He relies upon Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar & Ors., [MAC. APP. 940/2019, decided on 19th February, 2020] passed by the ld. Single Judge of this Court.

4. A perusal of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 shows that as per Section 140 of the unamended Act, the interim compensation could be granted in the following manner:

"140. Liability to pay compensation in certain cases on the principle of no fault.-

(1) Where death or permanent disablement of any person has resulted from an accident arising out of the use of a motor vehicle or motor vehicles, the owner of the vehicle shall, or, as the case may be, the owners of the vehicles shall, jointly and severally, be liable to pay compensation in respect of such death or disablement in accordance with the provisions of this section.

(2) The amount of compensation which shall be payable under sub-section (1) in respect of the death of any person shall be a fixed sum of [fifty thousand rupees] and the amount of compensation payable under that sub-section in respect of the permanent disablement of any person shall be a fixed sum of [twenty-five thousand rupees].

(3) In any claim for compensation under sub-section (1), the claimant shall not be required to plead and establish that the death or permanent disablement in respect of which the claim has been made was due to any wrongful act, neglect or default of the owner or owners of the vehicle or vehicles concerned or of any other person.

(4) A claim for compensation under sub-section (1) shall not be defeated by reason of any wrongful act, neglect or default of the person in respect of whose death or permanent disablement the claim has been made nor shall the quantum of compensation recoverable in respect of such death or permanent disablement be reduced on the basis of the share of such person in the responsibility for such death or permanent disablement.

[(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2) regarding death or bodily injury to any person, for which the owner of the vehicle is liable to give compensation for relief, he is also liable to pay compensation under any other law for the time being in force:

Provided that the amount of such compensation to be given under any other law shall be reduced from the amount of compensation payable under this section or under section 163A.]"

5. This provision has been deleted vide the Amendment Act, 2019. Insofar as Section 149 (3) of the Act, contained in Chapter XI of the Act, is concerned, the same has been amended by Section 51 of the Amendment Act, 2019. The language in Section 149 (3) as amended, is quite clear i.e., it is only if the Claimant, to whom the offer is made, "accepts such