SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Kamal Kumar - Respondent
CM(M) 533 of 2020 & CM Appl. 27392 of 2020
Decided On : 12-04-2021




Interim compensation is not permissible under the unamended Motor Vehicles Act when not a fixed amount; offers from insurance companies require claimant acceptance to be valid.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 140 and Section 149(3) - Interim compensation - The court held that Section 140 was deleted by the Amendment Act, 2019, and interim awards under the Act are no longer permissible. The insurance company's legal offer must be accepted by the claimant for an award to be valid - The appeal contested the ability of the Claims Tribunal to issue interim compensation based on the legal offer of the insurance company. (Paras 3, 7, 10)

(B) Applicability of the unamended Act - The court determined that the claims still fall under the unamended Act, 1988, thus interim awards based on offers are untenable when not fixed amounts. (Paras 8, 9)

(C) MACT procedure - Court directed the MACT to expediently adjudicate pending claim petitions, allowing for the issuance of interim compensation under the unamended Act if requested. (Para 10)

Findings of Court:
The interim awards issued by the Claims Tribunal were set aside. The MACT must resolve the claims by 31st July, 2021.

Issues: The court addressed the application of the unamended Motor Vehicles Act and the requirements for interim compensation offers.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that interim awards were not supported under the amended framework of the Act and rejected the idea that non-fixed amounts could be considered as interim compensation.

Result: Interim awards set aside; directions issued for timely adjudication.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through Video Conferencing.

2. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 14th February, 2020 passed by the Presiding Officer, (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi accepting the legal offer made by the insurance company and passing an interim award in terms of the said legal offer.

3. The challenge by the Petitioner/insurance company is to the effect that Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter, `the Act') by which interim compensation could be awarded, stands deleted from the Act by virtue of the amendment brought in by the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 (hereinafter, `the Amendment Act, 2019'). It is further submitted by Mr. Malik, ld. Counsel appearing for the insurance company that under Section 149(3) of the Act, an award in terms of the legal offer can be passed only if the said offer is accepted by the insured person. He relies upon Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar & Ors., [MAC. APP. 940/2019, decided on 19th February, 2020] passed by the ld. Single Judge of this Court.

4. A perusal of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 shows that as per Section 140 of the unamended Act, interim compensation could be granted in the following manner:

    "140. Liability to pay compensation in certain cases on the principle of no fault.-

    (1) Where death or permanent disablement of any person has resulted from an accident arising out of the use of a motor vehicle or motor vehicles, the owner of the vehicle shall, or, as the case may be, the owners of the vehicles shall, jointly and severally, be liable to pay compensation in respect of such death or disablement in accordance with the provisions of this section.

    (2) The amount of compensation which shall be payable under sub-section (1) in respect of the death of any person shall be a fixed sum of [fifty thousand rupees] and the amount of compensation payable under that sub-section in respect of the permanent disablement of any person shall be a fixed sum of [twenty-five thousand rupees].

    (3) In any claim for compensation under sub-section (1), the claimant shall not be required to plead and establish that the death or permanent disablement in respect of which the claim has been made was due to any wrongful act, neglect or default of the owner or owners of the vehicle or vehicles concerned or of any other person.

    (4) A claim for compensation under sub-section (1) shall not be defeated by reason of any wrongful act, neglect or default of the person in respect of whose death or permanent disablement the claim has been made nor shall the quantum of compensation recoverable in respect of such death or permanent disablement be reduced on the basis of the share of such person in the responsibility for such death or permanent disablement.

    [(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2) regarding death or bodily injury to any person, for which the owner of the vehicle is liable to give compensation for relief, he is also liable to pay compensation under any other law for the time being in force:

    Provided that the amount of such compensation to be given under any other law shall be reduced from the amount of compensation payable under this section or under section 163A.]

5. This provision has been deleted vide the Amendment Act, 2019. Insofar as Section 149(3) of the Act, contained in Chapter XI of the Act, is concerned, the same has been amended by Section 51 of the Amendment Act, 2019. The language in Section 149(3) as it now stands, is quite clear i.e., it is only if the Claimant, to whom the offer is made, "accepts such offers", the settlement can be recorded by the Claims Tribunal. Section 149(3) of the Act reads as under:

    "149.

    ....

    (3) If, the claimant to whom the offer is made under sub-section (2),-

    (a) accepts such offer,-

    (i) the Claims Tribunal shall make a record of such settlement, and such claim shall be deemed to be settled by consent; and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top