IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Ramjas School - Appellant
Versus
North Delhi Municipal Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 4429 of 2021 & CM Appl. 13536 of 2021
Decided On : 09-04-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing of assessment notices. (Para 2) |
| 2. disputes over assessment order and penalties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. agreement to provide documents and cooperate on assessment. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court directs fresh assessment and order conclusion. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
2. Petitioner seeks quashing of notices dated 04.09.2020, 17.12.2020 under Section 123D of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 as well as demand notices dated 22.10.2020 & 06.11.2020 under Section 154(1) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. Petitioner also seeks quashing of assessment orders, if any passed by the respondent and seeks a refund of an amount of Rs.1,21,55,000/- recovered by the respondent by attaching the bank account of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that an ex parte assessment order with regard to the subject property has already been passed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order has not been served on the petitioner and there was no ground of passing the ex parte assessment order.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the respondent has imposed interest and penalty on the petitioner on the alleged demand even though a moratorium was given to other property holders from payment of interest/penalty.
6. This is disputed by learned counsel for the respondent.
7. Be that as it may, learned counsel for the respondent submits that since the allegation is that an ex parte assessment order was passed, respondent is willing to give a fresh hearing to the petitioner subject to petitioner cooperating with the respondent by filing the requisite documents and permitting an inspection of the property.
8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that revised returns have already been filed. He submits that assessment is sought to be carried out for the period which is barred by limitation. He further submits that for the said period some of the documents may not be available.
9. Without prejudice to the objection of limitation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is willing to cooperate with the respondent and furnish all the documents that are in the power and possession of the petitioner and would also permit an inspection of the property, if so required by the officers of the respondent prior to passing the fresh assessment order.
10. Let a copy of the ex parte assessment order be furnished to learned counsel for the petitioner.
11. Petitioner shall file the requisite documents within a period of two weeks and petitioner shall also permit inspection of the subject property if so required by the officers of the respondent.
12. Respondent shall thereafter pass a fresh assessment order in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.
13. Respondent shall complete the assessment proceedings within a period of two weeks of petitioner furnishing the requisite documents to the respondent.
14. Enforcement of any further demand against the petitioner would be subject to the fresh assessment order to be passed by the respondent.
15. In case it is held by the assessing officer that excess amount has been recovered from the petitioner then the excess amount shall be refunded to the petitioner forthwith alongwith interest at the rate of 9% per annum payable from the date of the alleged illegal recovery.
16. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
17. Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.
The court emphasized the requirement of a fair hearing prior to the issuance of an ex parte assessment order, reinforcing principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.
Assessment orders cannot be issued without prior show cause notices to relevant parties, ensuring procedural fairness.
The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the petitioner's status as a tenant and the Corporation's right to issue a fresh show cause notice to the owner before passing a new asses....
The court affirmed the necessity of providing a fair opportunity to parties in administrative proceedings before making decisions that affect their rights, emphasizing protection against ex parte ord....
The right to a fair hearing necessitates an opportunity for a personal hearing before coercive actions related to property tax assessment are undertaken.
The principle of natural justice and the requirement for factual accuracy in assessment orders were central to the court's decision.
Noncompliance with statutory provisions and breach of principles of natural justice can lead to the maintainability of a suit, as established in the judgment.
Failure to provide mandatory notice in tax assessment renders the assessment order invalid, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice.
The court recognized the petitioner's rights to appeal the assessment to the Municipal Tax Tribunal, ensuring no coercive action occurs during the appeal process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.