SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
V.K. Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
Union Bank of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's prayers to quash orders and grant pension. (Para 1 , 2)
2. argument against the chargesheets and inquiry after retirement. (Para 3 , 4)
3. jurisdiction and maintainability defenses raised by the respondent. (Para 5 , 6)
4. allegations pertaining to moral turpitude and gratuity rights. (Para 7)
5. court's analysis of jurisdiction over case proceedings. (Para 8 , 9)
6. court observations on limitations regarding disciplinary proceedings. (Para 11)
7. analysis of prior judicial precedents on initiating proceedings post-retirement. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
8. limitations concerning chargesheets and prior incidents. (Para 16 , 17)
9. quashing of the chargesheet based on established legal principles. (Para 18 , 19)
10. final conclusion regarding orders on pension, gratuity, and leave encashment. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. (ORAL)--The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

    "In view of the foregoing submissions, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to:

    (a) issue writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ(s), order(s) or direction(s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top