DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Abhishek Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Office of District and Sessions Judge (HQ) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Present writ petitions have been preferred by the Petitioner challenging the impugned action of the Respondents whereby, the descriptive test of 100 marks has been dispensed with and consequently, the marks of the interview have been reduced during the process of recruitment to the posts of Junior Judicial Assistant (hereinafter referred to as `the JJA') and Data Entry Operator (Grade-A) (hereinafter referred to as `DEO (Grade-A)'). As the Petitioner had applied in the General/Unreserved category, these petitions pertain only to the said category. Since common questions are involved in both the writ petitions, they are being disposed of by a common judgment and facts to the extent they are different in the two writ petitions are being separately narrated hereinafter.
W.P. (C) 7122/2020
2. Respondent No.1/Office of District & Sessions Judge (HQs) issued a combined Vacancy Notice/Advertisement on 14.09.2020 inviting applications for recruitment to the vacant posts of Senior Personal Assistant, Personal Assistant, Junior Judicial Assistant and Data Entry Operator for the Office of District & Sessions Judge (HQs) Delhi and Office of Principal Judge, F
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.