SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Abhishek Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Office of District and Sessions Judge (HQ) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Present writ petitions have been preferred by the Petitioner challenging the impugned action of the Respondents whereby, the descriptive test of 100 marks has been dispensed with and consequently, the marks of the interview have been reduced during the process of recruitment to the posts of Junior Judicial Assistant (hereinafter referred to as `the JJA') and Data Entry Operator (Grade-A) (hereinafter referred to as `DEO (Grade-A)'). As the Petitioner had applied in the General/Unreserved category, these petitions pertain only to the said category. Since common questions are involved in both the writ petitions, they are being disposed of by a common judgment and facts to the extent they are different in the two writ petitions are being separately narrated hereinafter.

W.P. (C) 7122/2020

2. Respondent No.1/Office of District & Sessions Judge (HQs) issued a combined Vacancy Notice/Advertisement on 14.09.2020 inviting applications for recruitment to the vacant posts of Senior Personal Assistant, Personal Assistant, Junior Judicial Assistant and Data Entry Operator for the Office of District & Sessions Judge (HQs) Delhi and Office of Principal Judge, F









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top