HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, BENCH AT JAIPUR
SAMEER JAIN
Rachita Mathur Wife Of Dr. Rishabh Bhargawa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
Judgment : SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. The instant petition is filed with the following prayers:
“(i) declaring the impugned condition referred in the advertisement dated 27.11.2021 under clause “Selection Procedure” under the head of “Other Details” as illegal and unconstitutional and the same may kindly be struck down as constitutionally invalid;
(ii) directing the respondents to adhere to the notification dated 23.05.2022 issued by the Department of Personnel, Government of Rajasthan pursuant to the selection process on the post of Assistant Professor in furtherance of advertisement dated 27.11.2021 and the selection process for the of Assistant Professor (Skin & VD) in pursuance to advertisement dated 27.11.2021 be finalized based on the selection criteria provided for in the notification dated 23.05.2022 and if the petitioner is found eligible and meritorious she may be given appointment on the post of Assistant Professor (Skin & VD)
with all consequential benefits;”
FACTUAL NARRATIVE
2. The respondents issued an advertisement dated 27.11.2021 inviting applications for the post of Assistant Professors in the faculty of Skin and V.D.; governed by the Department of Medical Education under the









Ajay Hasia & Ors. Vs. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi & Ors.
Ashok Kumar Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Anr.
Praveen Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Ors.
Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission Vs. Navnit Kumar Potdar
A.P. Public Service Commission Vs. Baloji Badhavath
Anzar Ahmad Vs. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Asha Vs. Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences & Ors.
Amended Rules of 1962 mandate that interview marks in public examinations cannot exceed 10% of total marks to ensure fair and transparent selection processes, reaffirming principles of constitutional....
Recruitment criteria cannot be altered after the selection process begins, as it violates principles of fairness and predictability under public service law.
The selecting body has the authority to determine the method/criterion of selection, and the rules of the game cannot be changed once the game has started.
Rule 12(1)(i) of Rules of 2006 prescribes that no person selected for appointment by direct recruitment shall be appointed unless appointing authority is satisfied that he possesses a good moral char....
Allocation of interview marks must be transparent and compliant with existing rules at the time of advertisement.
Public Service Commission - Civil service Examination - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms - Public Service Commission have no power to relax the recruitment norms
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.