SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Samdev Dass Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) New Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. dispute arising from monetary transactions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioners seek to quash firs. (Para 3)
3. notices accepted; parties present. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. dispute resolved via memorandum of understanding. (Para 7 , 8)
5. complainants affirm settlement received. (Para 9)
6. court finds no purpose in continuing proceedings. (Para 10)
7. firs quashed; petitions disposed. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. The parties to the above captioned petitions are said to be neighbours and residing in the same building. A dispute amongst the parties arose with regard to certain monetary transactions, which culminated into registration of FIRs against the petitioners.

2. The above captioned first petition [Crl.M.C. 724/2021] pertains to FIR No. 193/2016, under Section 420 IPC, which was registered against the petitioners at the instance of respondent No.4-Rushabh Aggarwal. The above captioned second petition [Crl.M.C. 725/2021] pertains to FIR No. 290/2016, under Sections 323/506/509/354/34 IPC, which was registered against the petitioners at the instance of respondent No.2-Ritu Aggarwal. Both the FIRs have been registe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top