SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Karan Nayyar alias Vicky – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. quashing of fir sought by petitioners. (Para 1 , 2)
2. notice accepted; case taken up for hearing. (Para 3 , 4)
3. matrimonial dispute settled amicably. (Para 5 , 6)
4. no useful purpose in further prosecution. (Para 7)
5. fir quashed; petition allowed. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Vide this petition, quashing of FIR No. 1092/2015, registered at police station Prashant Vihar, Delhi is sought by petitioners.

2. Notice.

3. Ms. Richa Kapoor, learned Additional Standing Counsel for respondent No.1/State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present through video conferencing and she has been duly identified to be complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present through video conferencing.

4. With the consent of both the sides, the present petition has been taken up for final hearing and disposal.

5. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent no.2 was solemnized on 30.11.2010 as per Hindu rites. However, due to different mindsets, temperaments and incompatibilities, they started living separ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top