SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Shabaz – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. matrimonial dispute resolved and no grievance remains. (Para 1 , 4)
2. court recognizes presence and identification of parties. (Para 2 , 3)
3. fir quashed due to resolution of dispute. (Para 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Quashing of FIR No. 125/2020, under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC, registered at police station Shaheen Bagh, Delhi is sought on the ground that the matrimonial dispute between the parties stands amicably resolved in terms of Memorandum of Understanding dated 28.01.2021 and that divorce as per muslim law has been obtained by the parties.

2. Notice.

3. Ms. Kamna Vohra, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the respondent/State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2/complainant of this FIR, is present through video conferencing and she has been duly identified by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present through video conferencing.

4. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved in terms of Memorandum of Understanding dated 28.01.2021 and she has received the entire settled amount from petitioners a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top