Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Neelima Azhamchalil Moonnambeth – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for retrospective seniority based on eligibility. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner's argument regarding delay in dpc and seniority. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's reasoning against retrospective seniority claims. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. dismissal of the petition without costs. (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)
The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
CM 8645/2021 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
WP(C) 2868/2021
1. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 19.12.2019 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (`CAT'), Principal Bench in O.A. No. 3682 of 2019, titled Neelima Azhamchalil Moonnambeth & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr., dismissing the said O.A. of the petitioner herein.
2. The petitioner had filed the above O.A. primarily challenging the Seniority List dated 04.07.2018 for the post of Botanical Assistant and had sought retrospective seniority from the date when the petitioner became eligible to be promoted as Botanical Assistant Grade-II in accordance with the then existing Recruitment Rules. The petitioner also challenged the subsequent promotion g
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
