Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Dewan Chand – Appellant
Versus
Central Board Trustees – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenging dismissal of restoration application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner explains non-appearance and seeks restoration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court reviews cgit's findings on non-appearance. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. legal standards for condonation of delay under limitation act. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. court restores appeal with conditions and clarifies judicial intent. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Present petition has been filed assailing the order dated 19.11.2020 whereby the applications filed by the Petitioner for restoration of the appeal and condonation of delay in filing the restoration application have been dismissed.
2. Petitioner is a partnership firm with two partners. An Assessment Order was passed by Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Faridabad under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the `the Act') on 29.11.2012 assessing Rs.6,55,380/- allegedly payable by the Petitioner establishment. The said order was challenged by the Petitioner by an appeal before the Employees Provident Fund
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
