SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
R.A. Perfumery Works Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Kishore Chaurasia – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]

1. On the previous date, i.e., 01.06.2021, we had adjourned the matter to enable the parties to arrive at a settlement in the matter. 1.1. We are told that, an attempt was made in that behalf and proposals were exchanged, however, they did not fructify into a firm settlement.

2. Furthermore, as noted in the earlier order dated 01.06.2021, this appeal has been preferred against the ex-parte order dated 05.03.2021 passed by the trial Court in an application instituted by the respondent/plaintiff, under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short `CPC') in C.S. (COMM.) No. 132/2021 titled as Chandra Kishore Chaurasia vs. R. A. Perfumery Works Private Limited.

2.1. The appellant/defendant, we are told, has not filed a reply to the abovementioned application, as yet.

2.2. Given this position, Mr. Subhasis Sen Gupta, who appears on behalf of the appellant/defendant, says that liberty be given to withdraw the present appeal and approach the trial court for the adjudication of the abovementioned pending interlocutory application. Mr. Sen also seeks li

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top