SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1296

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Talwant Singh, JJ.
Tata Sia Airlines Limited - Appellant
Versus
Frankfinn Aviation Services (pvt.) Ltd - Respondent
First Appeal From Order (OS) (COMM) No. 33, 34 of 2022
Decided On : 09-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Akhil Sibal, Advocate, Kruttika Vijay, Advocate, C.M. Lall, Advocate, Kapil Midha, Advocate

Timely filing of replies to interlocutory applications and scheduling of the judge's consideration.

Headnote:

Order XXXIX Rule 4 of CPC - Interlocutory Applications - The court directed the respondent to file a reply to the appellant's application within ten days and vice versa, and set a date for the judge to consider the applications.

Fact of the Case:

The appeals were against a common order passed in interlocutory applications filed under Order XXXIX Rule 4 and Rule 2a of CPC in a suit.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the parties to file replies to each other's applications within specified timelines and set a date for the judge to consider the applications.

Issues: Interlocutory applications under Order XXXIX Rule 4 and Rule 2a of CPC, timelines for filing replies, and scheduling of the judge's consideration.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for the parties to file replies within specified timelines and set a date for the judge to consider the applications.

Final Decision: The court directed the parties to file replies within specified timelines and scheduled a date for the judge to consider the applications.

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J. - CM aPPL. 7299/2022 in FaO(OS) (COMM) 33/2022

CM aPPL. 7302/2022 in FaO(OS) (COMM) 34/2022

1. allowed, subject to just exceptions.

FaO(OS) (COMM) 33/2022 and CM aPPLs. 7297-98/2022

FaO(OS) (COMM) 34/2022 and CM aPPL. 7300-01/2022

2. Inter alia, the above-captioned appeals are directed against the common order dated 02.02.2022, passed by the learned single judge in the appellant's application, preferred under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (in short 'CPC') i.e., I.a. 1670/2022, and in respondent's application, filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2a of CPC i.e., I.a. 1795/2022. Both the applications have been preferred in a suit filed by the respondent i.e., CS(COMM) 54/2022.

2.1. Via the impugned order, the learned single judge has issued notice in the aforementioned interlocutory applications and given opportunity to the contesting side to file a reply. The applications have been listed by the learned single judge, on 07.03.2022.

3. Given the foregoing, counsels for the parties are agreed that the above-captioned appeals can be disposed of with the following directions:

    (i) The respondent will file a reply to the appellant's application preferred under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of CPC i.e., I.a. No.1670/2022, within ten days from today. Rejoinder thereto, if any, will be filed by the appellant, within one week of the reply being served.

    (ii) The appellant will file a reply to the respondent's application preferred under Order XXXIX Rule 2a of CPC i.e., I.a. No.1795/2022, within ten days from today. Rejoinder thereto, if any, will be filed by the respondent, within one week of the reply being served.

    (iii) The appellant's application i.e., I.a. No.1670/2022, and I.a. No.1188/2022, which is filed by the respondent under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, will be taken up by the learned single judge, in the first instance, on the date already fixed i.e., 07.03.2022, and if, for any reason, it is not possible to take up these applications on the said date, the same will be taken up on a date which is proximate to the given date.

    (iiia) Once the learned single judge has taken a view qua the aforementioned applications, he will, then, deal with the respondent's application i.e., I.a. No.1795/2022, which has been filed, as noticed above, under Order XXXIX Rule 2a of CPC.

    3.1. It is ordered accordingly.

    4. It is made clear that nothing stated hereinabove will impact the decision in any of the applications, referred to hereinabove, which are pending consideration before the learned single judge.

    5. Consequently, pending applications shall stand closed.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top