IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J.
Om College of Education - Appellant
Versus
National Council for Teacher Education - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2069 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 2395 of 2021
Decided On : 16-07-2021
JUDGMENT
Prateek Jalan, J. (ORAL)--The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
CM APPL. 20828/2021 (delay) in REVIEW PET. 101/2021 in W.P.(C) 2069/2021
CM APPL. 20733/2021 (delay) in REVIEW PET. 100/2021 in W.P.(C) 2395/2021
For the reasons stated in the applications seeking condonation of delay, the delay of 52 days in filing the review petitions is condoned. The applications stand disposed of.
CM APPL. 20829/2021 (exemption) in REVIEW PET. 101/2021 in W.P.(C) 2069/2021
CM APPL. 20734/2021 (exemption) in REVIEW PET. 100/2021 in W.P.(C) 2395/2021
Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The applications stand disposed of.
REVIEW PET. 101/2021 in W.P.(C) 2069/2021
REVIEW PET. 100/2021 in W.P.(C) 2395/2021
1. These petitions have been filed by the National Council for Teacher Education ["NCTE"], seeking review of a judgment dated 12.04.2021 in the captioned writ petitions, to the extent that the Chairperson of the NCTE was directed to exercise the powers conferred under Regulation 121 of the National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition Norms & Procedure) Regulations, 2014 ["the 1 "12. Power to relax - (1) On the recommendations of the Central Government, or State Government, or Union territory Administration concerned, or in cases for removal of any hardship caused in adhering to the provisions in these regulations, keeping in view the circumstances peculiar to the said Governments or Union territory, it shall be open to the Chairperson, for reasons to be recorded in writing, to relax any of the provisions of these regulations, in respect of any class or category of institutions, in the concerned State or Union Territory, or of Central Government institutions to such an extent and subject to such conditions, as may be specified in the order and decisions shall be brought to the notice of the Council in the next meeting. In exceptional cases and for reasons to be recorded in writing, the Chairperson, shall be competent to relax any of the provisions of these regulations and the related norms and standards subject to its ratification by the Council." Regulations"].
2. The captioned writ petitions were filed by institutions in whose favour the NCTE had issued Letters of Intent ["LOI"] under Regulation 7 of the Regulations. The petitioners were required under the conditions of the LOI to obtain approval of their faculty lists from the affiliating body, i.e., the State of Rajasthan. The State of Rajasthan did not cooperate in this process in view of a government policy against the establishment of Diploma in Elementary Education ["D.El.Ed."] courses in the State.
3. In the judgment under review, this Court noticed the judgment of the Supreme Court in State of Maharashtra vs. Sant Dnyaneshwar Shikshan Shastra Mahavidyalaya and Others [(2006) 9 SCC 1], and passed the following directions:
"24. In these circumstances, the petitions are disposed of with the following directions: -
a. The Directorate of Elementary Education, Government of Rajasthan is directed to nominate an expert to participate in the selection committee of the faculty for the petitioner-institutions within a period of one week from today.
b. In the event the State of Rajasthan nominates its expert within the aforesaid period, the expert and the State of Rajasthan will cooperate in the expeditious conduct of the selection process, so that the process of faculty approval is concluded within a period of four weeks thereafter.
c. In the event the State of Rajasthan does not nominate an expert in terms of the aforesaid direction, the matter be placed before the Chairperson of the NCTE in terms of Regulation 12 of the Regulations. The participation of the representative of the State of Rajasthan in the Selection Committee and the requirement for the approval of the faculty list by the State of Rajasthan will be waived in the facts and circumstances of the case. The Chairperson will take a decision in terms thereof and
Regulation 12 of the National Council for Teacher Education allows for relaxation in regulations due to hardship caused by state actions, applicable to both individual institutions and broader catego....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Regulation 12 of the National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition Norms & Procedure) Regulations, 2....
State policies cannot impede the NCTE's exclusive authority in granting recognition to educational institutions under the National Council for Teacher Education Act.
The NCTE has the sole discretion to grant or refuse recognition, and the State Government cannot interfere with this process. The NCTE can exercise the power to relax the provisions of the Regulation....
NCTE has the final authority over recognition applications regardless of state restrictions, which limits the state's role to recommending actions without binding NCTE's decisions.
The right to establish educational institutions is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) and can only be restricted by law; a mere policy decision cannot impose a general ban on new institutions....
The court's decision was influenced by the petitioner's claim of obtaining a No-Objection Certificate (NOC) from the affiliating university, leading to the reexamination of the application for recogn....
Pending applications for educational institution recognition must be evaluated under regulations in effect at the time of application, with a requirement for administrative decisions to be reasoned.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.