Anand Prakash vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKTA GUPTA
Anand Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Table of Content
1. conviction for sexual offences against minors. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. court confirms evidence and sentence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. appeal dismissed; proceedings upheld. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Mukta Gupta, J. The hearing has been conducted through Video Conferencing.

CRL.A. 285/2020

1. By this appeal, the appellant has challenged the impugned judgment dated 9th August, 2019, whereby the appellant has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 354B IPC for outraging the modesty of minor girl and for committing an offence punishable under Section 12 of the POCSO Act.

2. Vide the order on sentence dated 27th September, 2019, the appellant was awarded simple imprisonment for a period of three years and a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default whereof, to undergo simple imprisonment for one month for offence punishable under Section 354B IPC. For offence under Section 12 of the POCSO Act, the appellant was awarded simple imprisonment to the period already undergone with a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. The victim was awarded with the compensation of Rs.1 lakh out of which the appellant wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document