Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Amardeep Builders – Appellant
Versus
G.N.C.T. of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes referred under arbitration act (Para 1) |
| 2. caveats regarding arbitrability and defences (Para 2) |
| 3. three separate arbitrations with single arbitrator (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. appointment of justice rajiv sahai endlaw as arbitrator (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. court not expressing opinions on issues raised (Para 8 , 9) |
(Video-Conferencing)
C. Hari Shankar, J. These are petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("the 1996 Act"), seeking reference of the disputes between the parties to arbitration.
2. While learned counsel for the GNCTD in Arb. P. 22/2021 and Arb. P. 23/2021 was agreeable to the matter being referred to arbitration by an arbitrator to be appointed by the Court, Mr. Dhawan, learned counsel for the respondent in Arb. P. 24/2021 seeks a caveat, while appointing the arbitrator, to the effect that the arbitrability of the dispute as well as all defences available in law including the plea of limitation should be left open to be agitated before the learned Arbitral Tribunal.
3. In view thereof, I do not deem it necessary to burden this order with any detailed reference to the facts of the case. As there are three separat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
