SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Nirkara Subudhi - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8367 of 2021 & C.M. No. 25911 of 2021
Decided On : 13-08-2021




The court established the principle that similarly placed individuals must be granted equal pension benefits, ensuring fairness and due process in administrative decisions.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14 - Right to Equality and fair treatment in matters of pension - Petitioners sought pro rata pension benefits on par with similarly situated individuals in related cases. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Administrative Law - Principles of natural justice - Respondents required to communicate reasons in writing if petitioners found not entitled to benefits after verification. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners contended entitlement to pro rata pension similarly to outcomes in earlier judgments, with necessary NOCs provided.

Findings of Court:
Directions issued to grant pension if qualifying, with a stipulation for communication of reasons if otherwise.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to the same pension benefits as granted to other petitioners in similar cases.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that pension rights must be extended to similarly placed individuals, reaffirming the duty of the respondents to ensure fairness and due process.

Result: Petitioners' claims allowed, with a directive for the respondents to act within specified timelines.

Table of Content
1. petitioners claim relief based on precedent cases. (Para 2 , 3)
2. respondents agree to verify claims with rights reserved. (Para 4)
3. court orders payment of pro rata pension within timeline. (Para 5 , 6)
4. order to be communicated and published promptly. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners in the present petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the present petition along with pending application is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioners within a week.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top