SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Shubhranshu Mishra - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 295 of 2021 & CM Appl. 764 of 2021
Decided On : 11-01-2021




Similar claimants must be granted equal pension rights based on verified eligibility against established legal precedents.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles related to pension rights - Petitioners seek pro rata pension similar to precedents in Brijlal Kumar and Govind Kumar Srivastava - All requisite No Objection Certificates filed - Respondents to verify similarities with earlier judgments. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Pension rights - The court affirms that similarly situated individuals must receive equal treatment regarding pension entitlements based on the principles laid out in prior judgments. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners seek pro rata pension similar to previous judgments involving the Indian Air Force, asserting their eligibility based on filed NOCs.

Findings of Court:
The court directed the respondents to grant arrears and continue future payments of pro rata pension if petitioners are similarly situated.

Issues: Whether the petitioners are entitled to pro rata pension based upon existing judgments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted the need for equal treatment in pension rights, conditional upon verification of eligibility reminiscent of prior cases.

Result: The petition is disposed of with directions to grant pension if eligibility is confirmed.

Table of Content
1. claim of pro rata pension entitlement. (Para 2 , 3)
2. right to verification and appeal saved. (Para 4)
3. formal communication and payment conditions. (Para 5 , 7)
4. order for granting pro rata pension. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that all the petitioners in these petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions, 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) have been filed along with the petition.

4. Learned counsels for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petitions be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners or any of them, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top