Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Orris Infrastructure Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for review of previous court order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. writ petitions seeking to set aside prior orders. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner aggrieved by consumer order. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. contention on jurisdiction post-repeal of consumer protection act. (Para 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. arguments regarding the effect of amendments. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 6. supreme court's interpretation of statutory remedies. (Para 15 , 18) |
| 7. court's observations on jurisdictional continuity. (Para 19 , 21) |
| 8. legislative intent behind transitional provisions. (Para 22 , 30) |
| 9. repeal provisions protect existing rights. (Para 23 , 25 , 28) |
| 10. continuation of legal proceedings despite repeal. (Para 26 , 27 , 31) |
| 11. final dismissal of review applications with costs. (Para 32 , 34 , 39) |
JUDGMENT
REV. PET 9/2021 & CM APPL. 9166/2021 in W.P.(C) 6769/2020 REV. PET 8/2021 & CM APPL. 9726/2021 in W.P.(C) 6770/2020
1. These Review Application(s) have been filed by the writ petitioner seeking review/recall of the Order dated 03.11.2020 passed by this Court dismissing the writ petition(s) filed by the petitioner on the ground of availability of alternate efficacious remedy in form of a statutory appeal, and granting
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
