SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 142

HEMANT GUPTA, V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
ECGC Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mokul Shriram EPC JV – Respondent


ORDER :

1. The present appeal is directed against an order passed by the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission1 [National Commission] whereby the appellant herein was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 265.01 Crores along with interest @ 10% p.a. from 19.9.2016 within a period of three months. In case of failure to deposit the said amount, the awarded amount would carry compensation in the form of simple interest @ 12% p.a. The appellant has filed an application (I.A. No. 99210 of 2021) ex abundanti cautela to entertain the appeal as per provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 19862 [for short the ‘1986 Act’]. It is the said application which is being decided by the present order.

2. The complainant was awarded a contract for construction of rain water drainage, heavy sewerage and municipal road system by the Government of Basra, Iraq. The complainant obtained two specific contracts (Letter of Credit Comprehensive Risks Policies) by paying a sum of Rs. 10,38,03,912/- as premium to the appellant. The grievance of the complainant was that the payment for invoices issued for t

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top