SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Anup Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
Madan Lal Bhatia – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. This is a regular second appeal challenging the impugned judgment dated 27th July, 2020 passed in an appeal challenging judgment/decree dated 27th October, 2018 passed by the Trial Court.

3. The property in question is property bearing no. 26/67, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi-110008, a two-storey house on a 100 Sq. Yards lease-hold plot (hereinafter, `suit property'). The Plaintiff/Respondent No.1- Mr. Madan Lal Bhatia (hereinafter, `Plaintiff') filed a suit for possession against various family members i.e., the children of his brother - Mr. Kishan Chand Bhatia, seeking reliefs of possession, mesne profits, etc. The case of the Plaintiff is that by Will dated 6th February, 1985, executed by his mother - Mrs. Ram Lubhai, he became the absolute owner of the suit property. According to the Plaintiff, Mrs. Ram Lubhai was the absolute owner of the suit property in view of the sale agreement dated 8th November, 1960. The suit property was originally allotted in the name of his father - Mr. Ram Chand Bhatia. After the death of Mr. Ram Chand Bhatia, the suit property was mutated in the name

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top