SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 272

P.SREE SUDHA
Annapurna – Appellant
Versus
N. Srinivas – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Malleswara Rao Kallu
For the Respondent: Shyam S Agrawal

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 13.09.2019 passed in O.S.No.90 of 2015 on the file of the learned III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad.

2. The suit O.S.No.90 of 2015 was filed by the plaintiff seeking recovery of possession, for mesne profits and for perpetual injunction. The trial Court after considering the entire oral and documentary evidence on record, decreed the suit directing the defendant to vacate and handover the physical possession of house bearing No.12-11-339/2, measuring 101 square yards, Warasiguda, Secunderabad, (hereinafter, ‘the suit schedule property’) and granted mesne profits at the rate of Rs.10,000/- per month from the date of filing suit to till the date of realisation and also granted perpetual injunction as sought for. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, the defendant preferred this Appeal.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant would contend that the suit is filed for recovery of possession without seeking for declaratory relief in respect of the title over the suit schedule property is not maintainable. He would further contend that the trial Court failed to consider that the title of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top