Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Amit Meharia – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petitions and background. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. rejection of rti requests by authorities. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments on fraud and privacy. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. analysis of privacy concerns under rti. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. available legal remedies for the petitioner. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. conclusion and directives for the petitioner. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. final disposition of the case. (Para 24) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. The present four petitions have been filed by the Petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 5th January, 2021 passed in Second Appeal by the Central Information Commission (hereinafter `CIC') in four separate cases arising out of four applications under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter "RTI Act, 2005"). The said RTI applications dated 28th June, 2018 were filed by the Petitioner herein, seeking information relating to the complaints lodged by his estranged wife, Ms. Abhilasha Malhotra, impleaded as Respondent No.4 herein, against her previous two husbands and their family members.
3. The Petitioner was married to Respo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
