Anuj vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Anuj – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent

Table of Content
1. context of the writ petition and qualifications. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments concerning the ctet exam requirements. (Para 4)
3. dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]

CM No. 18999/2021

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

CM No. 19000/2021, CM No. 19242/2021

2. The prayer made in the captioned applications is to grant exemption from filing attested copies of the affidavit(s) in support of the accompanying writ petition and interlocutory applications.

2.1. The captioned applications are disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to place on record the duly sworn/notarised/affirmed affidavit(s), within three days of this court resuming its normal and usual work pattern, notwithstanding the order passed in the main matter.

W.P.(C) 6006/2021, CM No. 19241/2021

3. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 22.06.2021, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (in short `the Tribunal) in OA No.1141/2021.

3.1. The backdrop in which the instant writ petition has been filed is as follows:

3.2. The Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Boar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document