Praveen Khatri vs Govt Of NCT Of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Del) 945

RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Praveen Khatri – Appellant
Versus
Govt Of NCT Of Delhi – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Sudhir Naagar, Advocate, Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate, N.K. Singh, Advocate, Tania Ahlawat, Advocate, Namrata Mukim, Advocate, Garima Jindal, Advocate, Seema Dolo, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Rajiv Shakdher, J. - CM No.22861/2020

CM No. 25471/2020

1. It needs to be stated at the very outset that, the above-captioned application i.e., CM No.22861/2020 has been moved by petitioners no.4 to 6, while CM No.25471/2020 has been moved by the applicants, who are parties to O.A. No.3647/2018, which was disposed of vide the impugned order dated 02.04.2019. The said O.A. was, in fact, dismissed.

2. Mr. Sudhir Naagar, who appears on behalf of petitioners no.4 to 6, as well as the applicants in CM No.25471/2020[ " persons represented"], says that, although several persons, similarly circumstanced, have been granted the relief, the persons represented by him had not been accorded relief. In other words, one time relaxation granted to others with regard to late submission of certificate to establish that the candidate had qualified the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (in short "CTET") was not extended to the persons represented. We are told in all cases CTET was cleared and certificates were obtained, before the appointment to the post of "Special Educator (Primary)" [Post Code 15/17]; the advertisement qua which was published on 15.09.2017.

2.1. It is Mr. Naagars contention that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document