SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Shiv Kumar – Appellant
Versus
South Delhi Municipal Corporation – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (ORAL)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks a direction against the respondent to take action against the alleged illegal construction being raised on property no. G-9/4, Gali No. 9, Ratia Marg, Sangam Vihar, New Delhi.

3. It is conceded by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has no connection with the property and is also not a neighbour of the subject property.

4. He concedes that neither his light, air nor ingress - egress is affected by the alleged illegal construction.

5. A Petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India would lie for enforcement of the fundamental rights or other legal rights. Petitioner, admittedly, does not have any connection with the subject property and has failed to show as to which legal right of the petitioner is affected by the alleged illegal construction.

6. It is submitted that by learned counsel for the petitioner that son of respondent no. 2 had filed a petition against several illegally constructed properties in the vicinity and Corporation is taking action on his complaint.

7. This petition seems to be a retaliatory petition filed by the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top