SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Hemant Pokhriyal – Appellant
Versus
Staff Selection Commission – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to selection procedure based on reservations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments against inclusion in general category due to relaxations. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. supreme court's interpretation on merit versus reserved categories. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. clarification on status and rights of reserved category candidates. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. court's decision on relief and prospective application. (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed challenging the selection procedure of the respondents for the post of Constable (GD) in the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs), NIA, SSF and Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles insofar as it debars a candidate from the reserved category from being adjusted against the General vacancy if the candidate has availed any relaxation irrespective of the fact that such relaxation is also available to the General category candidates.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner belongs to Other Backward Class (OBC) from the border guarding district of Uttarkashi, under the Garhwal division of Uttarakhand. He further

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top