SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Khushwant Jangra - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 11486 of 2021 & C.M. Nos. 35423-35424 of 2021, W.P.(C) 11499 of 2021 & C.M. Nos. 35443-35444 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 11515 of 2021 & C.M. Nos. 35499-35500 of 2021
Decided On : 07-10-2021




The Court emphasizes the evaluation of the decision-making process over the decision itself in administrative matters, confirming the adequacy of the medical re-examinations conducted.

Headnote:(A) The Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ jurisdiction - A petition was filed seeking re-examination by an independent medical board after allegations of an unfair medical testing process. The Court directed a fresh ECG and blood pressure examination, asserting the need for independent assessment. (Paras 3, 4, 6)

(B) Administrative law - Decision-making process - The Court examines the decision-making process rather than the ultimate decision, noting that no specific allegations of mala fide exist against officials involved. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The appellants argued that previous medical tests conducted under the Respondents were flawed due to hostile attitudes and inappropriate conditions, claiming low temperatures affected test results. The Court found the allegations unsubstantiated.

Findings of Court:
The Court affirmed that the Petitioners had been adequately re-examined by the medical board and found no further grounds for intervention.

Issues: The core issue was whether the medical evaluation process was fair and if the petitioners should be re-examined by an independent panel.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court highlighted the significance of evaluating the decision-making process in administrative actions and concluded that the medical re-examinations conducted were sufficient and in accordance with the earlier directive.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek medical re-examination. (Para 1)
2. petitioners allege hostile attitude and improper testing conditions. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's reasoning addresses procedural fairness and test conditions. (Para 4 , 5)
4. no further action needed; medical examination satisfactory. (Para 6)
5. writ petitions dismissed. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petitions have been filed seeking directions to the Respondents to re-examine and re-conduct medical test of the Petitioners under supervision of an independent Medical Board having independent doctor or re-examine the Petitioners at R & R Hospital, New Delhi or AIIMS, New Delhi.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners had earlier preferred writ petitions challenging the arbitrary act of Respondents in conducting the Appeal Medical Board and this Court vide order dated 1st September, 2021 had disposed of the petitions with a direction to the Respondents to conduct a fresh medical examination by the Review Medical Board.

3. He states that the Petitioners duly appeared before Review Medical Board on 17th September 2021 where the attitude of the Respondents was hostile towards the Petitioners. He states that the Petitioners were then referred to AFCME where they were made to sit in a chilled air conditioned room from 10.00 am to 12.30 pm and thereafter immediately their BP and ECG were recorded. He states that low temperature results in increase of blood pressure and the Respondents knowingly adopted the said procedure to ensure that the Petitioners are unable to pass the medical examination. He emphasises that in the earlier tests, blood pressure of the petitioners had been found within the normal range.

4. It is settled law that this Court examines the decision making process and not the decision itself. In the present case, the matter had been remanded to the Review Medical Board so that the Respondents could conduct another ECG of the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court, the direction to conduct a fresh ECG would encompass the direction to re-examine the blood pressure of the petitioners.

5. The allegation that the Petitioners were made to sit in a chilled air conditioned room for two hours does not impress this Court because if the Petitioners had been successful in their medical tests, they could have been posted anywhere in India including Ladakh, where the temperature in winters goes below minus 20 degree. It is also pertinent to mention that no allegation of mala fide has been made against any particular officer of the Respondents.

6. Consequently, as in the present case, the Petitioners have been re-examined by the Appeal/Review Medical Board, this Court is of the view that no further interference is called for in writ jurisdiction.

7. Accordingly, the present writ petitions along with pending applications are dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top