Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
Resoursys Telecom – Appellant
Versus
Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the writ petition (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner's bid submission details (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. petitioner's argument on category similarity (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. respondent's argument on product categorization (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. court's observations on tender process and jurisdiction (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. respondent's position on jurisdiction and authority (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. judicial interpretation of tender terms (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. interpretation of 'similar category products' (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. court's assessment of rationality in decision-making (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 10. principles of tender interpretation (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 11. final conclusion and order of the court (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
JUDGMENT
1. The present writ petition has been filed to seek the quashing of invitation to tender dated 12.02.2021 bearing No. GEM/2021/b/1032762 issued by Respondent No.1 i.e. Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti on the portal of Government E-Market Place (GEM), and in particular, letter dated 29.06.2021 issued to the Petitioner.
2. Briefly stated the facts as per petitioner giving ris
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
