SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Hero Fincorp. Limited – Appellant
Versus
Hema Automotive Private Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. dispute arises from loan agreements and defaults. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. petitioner seeks appointment of arbitrator. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
3. court observes compliance and appointment of arbitrator. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. court allows and disposes of the petitions. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The above captioned three petitions have been filed under Section 11 (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

2. Since the parties to these petitions and subject matter thereof is more or less similar, therefore, with the consent of counsel representing both the sides, these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

3. According to petitioner, petitioner-company sanctioned loan facility in the sum of Rs.30 Crores on 22.01.2018 (in Arb.P.724/2021) Rs.20 Crores on 22.01.2018 in (Arb.P.726/2021) and Rs.5 Crores on 23.05.2019 in (Arb.P.728/2021) in favour of the respondent No.1.

4. According to petitioner, written Loan/Facility Agreements were executed in respect of loan facility between respondent No.1 as borrower an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top