SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Sanjay Iron and Steel Limited – Appellant
Versus
Steel Authority of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Petitioner - M/s Sanjay Iron & Steel Ltd. claims to be doing business of trading of iron and steel. According to petitioner, respondent -Steel Authority of India Limited is a Government Company, who had invited online tenders for operating as Distributor involving purchasing, transportation, handling and storage, processing and sales to dealers of TMT/TMT Coils/at Panchkula Cluster in the State of Haryana. The petitioner claims to have submitted its tender on 08.08.2019, which was accepted by respondent vide letter of intent/acceptance bearing No. Tender No. SAIL/NR/Distributor/19-20/01A, dated 25.06.2019. Petitioner further claims to have deposited full security amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and bank guarantees to the tune of Rs.1,28,00,000/-, prepared by Union Bank of India in favour of respondent vide letter dated 23.10.2019 and complied with all the terms as per online tender terms vide reference No. CMO/REC/BS/CHA/Distributor-Panchkula/19-20 dated 30.09.2019. Petitioner had entered into an agreement dated 7.11.2019 with respondent for operating as Distributor.

2. According to petitioner, respondent in clear breach of terms of the agreement started executing the order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top