Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Jitin Garg – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed against dismissal of writ petition (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts surrounding the auction and payment timelines (Para 4 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. contentions regarding non-payment during covid-19 (Para 5 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. court's view on appellant's vigilance and contract obligations (Para 9 , 11 , 13) |
| 5. final dismissal of appeal with reference to lower court's decision (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (oral)
CM APPL. 39266/2021 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
LPA 419/2021 & CM APPL. 39265/2021 (Stay)
1. Being aggrieved and feeling dissatisfied with the judgement and order dated 20.09.2021 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.10331/2020, the Original Petitioner has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal.
2. Appellant had approached the learned Single Judge seeking a direction to the Respondent/DDA to extend the time for depositing 75% of the balance amount and issue a fresh Demand Notice. The writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge on a short ground that the DDA by its Circular dated 02.12.2020 had granted further time to all similarly placed persons to make payments by 31.12
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
