IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Yogesh Khanna, J.
Ashish Gupta - Appellant
Versus
Government of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
TEST.CAS. 47 of 2021
Decided On : 11-11-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for grant of probate based on a valid will. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. no objection to grant of probate from family heirs. (Para 4 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. evidence supporting valid execution of the will. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court grants probate for valid will dated 10.02.2021. (Para 12) |
| 5. formalities to finalize grant of probate. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
Yogesh Khanna, J. (Though Video Conferencing)--This is a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of probate in respect of the last valid and legal Will dated 10.02.2021 of late Shyam Sunder.
2. It is alleged the last Will/testament has been validly executed by the testator and has been duly registered with the Sub Registrar-V(I), Delhi. The family tree of deceased Shyam Sunder is given in para No.2 of the petition. He was survived by his wife Urmila Devi/respondent No.2; his son Ashish Gupta/ petitioner; his daughter Nidhi Bansal/respondent No.3; and another daughter Neeti Khandelwal/respondent No.4. It is alleged there is no impediment in grant of probate in respect of the Will dated 10.02.2021 of deceased Shyam Sunder as the class I legal heirs of deceased have no objection to the Will and accepted it and request for grant of probate. The wife of deceased as also his children who are parties to this petition have no objection for grant of probate and the bequest granted therein. The respondents No.2 to 4 have executed and filed their affidavits of no objection before this Court and have also filed consolidated written statement wherein they have not raised any objection for grant of probate in respect of the Will dated 10.02.2021.
3. The Will dated 10.02.2021 is annexed as Annexure A along with the documents. A bare perusal of the said Will dated 10.02.2021 would show deceased Shyam Sunder was the sole, absolute and exclusive owner of the moveable and immovable properties, including 1/3rd of the property bearing No.21, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi-110003 (hereinafter referred as subject property) which is bequeathed in favour of the petitioner herein to an extent of 1/3rd undivided share. The petitioner has also been appointed executant under the Will dated 10.02.2021. The schedule I to this petition describes the property as No.21, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi 110003 to the extent of 1/3rd undivided share with beneficiary Ashish Gupta/petitioner herein. The deceased Shyam Sunder was an ordinary resident of this property, hence this Court has the jurisdiction to entertain this probate petition.
4. I have perused the pleadings, including the affidavits of respondents No.2 to 4; the evidence so adduced on record, and heard the submissions made by the learned counsels for parties. The respondents No.2 to 4 have submitted they have no objection to the grant of probate in favour of petitioner herein, an executor of the Will dated 10.02.2021 of deceased Shyam Sunder.
5. The petitioner has led the evidence and the evidentiary affidavits of both attesting witnesses have been filed on record along with his own affidavit of evidence.
6. PW1 Sunil Gupta, one of the attesting witness deposed he has witnesseth the Will dated 10.02.2021 - Ex.PW1/A and identified signatures of the testator Shyam Sunder at points A1 to A4; the photographs of Shyam Sunder at point A5; his own photograph at point A6; the photograph of another attesting witness namely Dinesh Gupta at point A7. He deposed the Will dated 10.02.2021 has been executed by Shyam Sunder in the presence of both attesting witnesses and they all have signed the Will in the presence of each other.
7. Similar is an affidavit of the other attesting witness Dinesh Gupta qua the manner of execution of Will dated 10.02.2021.
8. The affidavit of petitioner - Ashish Gupta has also been placed on record wherein he states about the contents of the probate petition and that there exist no impediment for grant of probate since all his relatives, who are Class I heirs of the testator, have filed
The court affirmed the validity of a Will for probate when all Class I heirs consented and supported it with affidavits, thus underscoring the necessity of formal execution and absence of objections.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the grant of probate under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for the 1/3rd undivided share of the property as per the Will dated 10.02....
Unchallenged and un-rebutted testimony of petitioner and attesting witness proves that Will is last and final Will of deceased.
The court held that a will can be granted probate when supported by the testimony of at least one attesting witness and no objections from other beneficiaries, thereby establishing its authenticity.
The main legal point established is the requirement of voluntary execution of a Will and the appointment of an Executor for granting a Certificate of Probate under the Indian Succession Act.
The court upheld the validity of a Will based on attesting witness testimony, ruling that uncontested evidence and a No Objection Certificate from a legal heir warranted the grant of Probate.
Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 requires Will to be proved by examination of at least one of two witnesses.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of fulfilling the conditions for execution and proof of a Will as per the Indian Succession Act and the Indian Evidence Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.