Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Rubina – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for probate of will (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. property valuation details (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. witness testimonies for will validity (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. uncontested petition supports granting (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. authencity of the will established (Para 9 , 11) |
| 6. administration of will granted (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
Neena Bansal Krishna, J.
1. The petitioner through Mr. Ankit Bhattacharya, Special Power Attorney has filed the present petition to seek grant of Probate of the Will dated 21st October, 2014 of his father Late Shri Subhash Chander under Section 276 Indian Succession Act, 1925.
2. It is stated that Late Subhash Chander was married to Smt. Shakuntala and from their wed-lock two sons namely Sumit Kashyap and Nishant Kashyap, the respondent No.2&3 and one daughter Smt. Rubina, the petitioner were born. Smt. Shakuntala died on 23rd October, 2010. Shri Subhash Chander expired on 21st May, 2016. During his life time he executed a Will dated 21st October, 2014 in respect of his immovable properties namely:
a. Janta Flat No. 69, on the First Floor, situated at Vikaspuri, New Delhi-110018.
b. HIG Flat No. 183, 8th Floor, Category-B, Block-1, Sector-18-A, th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
