SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Md. Khurshid Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. allegations of rape and property fraud. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. defense claims of false allegations and counter disputes. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. nature of allegations and consideration for bail. (Para 12 , 13)
4. standard for granting anticipatory bail. (Para 14)
5. conditions for granting bail. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)

ORDER

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 618/2020 U/s 376D/506 IPC registered at Police Station Wazirabad, Delhi.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that complainant "K" made a complaint at PS Wazirabad alleging therein that she had purchased a flat in DLF colony in Ghaziabad for an amount of Rs. 5,80,000 from petitioner Khurshid Khan through one Faizan. This property was to be registered in the name of complainant but instead of registering the property, GPA was executed by both the accused persons. They also told her that they were partners in said property & the total cost of the property is Rs. 22 lakh.

3. As this DLF property was far from Delhi and children of complainant were also doing work in Delhi, acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top