SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Urvashi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Rai – Respondent


Table of Content
1. description of property for partition. (Para 1)
2. settlement agreement between the parties. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's permission for withdrawal of suit. (Para 3 , 10)
4. dismissal of suit and return of documents. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

IA No. 15117/2021(u/O XXIII R 1 r/w Sec. 151 CPC)

1. In the present suit for partition and declaration with respect to property at bearing No. P-86, New Delhi South Ext.-Part-II, New Delhi110049 admeasuring 250 sq. yds and built up area of 150 sq. yds with ground floor and first floor, the present application has been filed by the plaintiff seeking withdrawal of the same.

2. At the hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of plaintiff has submitted that the parties to the present suit are related to each other and with the intervention of well wisher of the parties, the subject matter of dispute stands amicably resolved.

3. Notice issued.

4. Ms. Poornima Maheshwari, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of defendant and she has affirmed the submission advanced on behalf of plaintiff.

5. Learned counsel for defendant submits that in terms of settlement, defendant-Sanjeev Rai has agreed to pay a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top