SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Vikash Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Director General, Indo-Tibetan Boarder Police Force – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

C.M.No.38083/2021 (for exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, present application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 12184/2021 & C.M.No.38084/2021

1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the Respondents to appoint the petitioner against the post of Constable (Driver)- 2018 in the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) Force.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner applied for the post of Constable (Driver) under OBC category and successfully qualified PET/PST, written test and documentation and practical (skill) test.

3. He states that subsequently the petitioner was called on 14th September 2021 at the Referral Hospital, ITBP, Surajpur, Greater Noida for a detailed medical examination wherein he was declared unfit on the ground of a tattoo embossed on his right arm.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the tattoo mark on the petitioner's right arm is his own name and it does not cause any prejudice to anyone and the same is within the permissible limits as provided under the rules. He also states that none of the government guidelines prohibit tattoo as a medical disqu






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top