SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Narula, J.
Bamanbore Tollway Private Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
National Highways Authority of India - Respondent
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 392 of 2021 & I.A. 15789 of 2021
Decided On : 01-12-2021




Right to recover damages as per contractual agreements is independent of prior remedial measures, allowing unilateral calculations by authorities for damages under specified articles.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9 - Petition for interim measures pending arbitration - The petitioner sought to restrain the respondent from coercive recovery of damages for repair obligations under the Concession Agreement dated 26th April, 2018, regarding highway maintenance. The petitioner contested the unilateral calculation of damages by the respondent while asserting compliance with maintenance requirements. (Paras 2.1, 3.1, 4, 6)

(B) Right to remedial measures - NHAI's right to recover damages is established under Articles 15.8 and 15.9 of the Agreement, delineating the process for invoking funds from the escrow account. The Court found that the right of recovery for damages is independent and requires the contractual conditions to be met. (Paras 6, 9)

(C) Dismissal of the petition - The Court concluded that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a prima facie case and balance of convenience for granting the interim relief sought. (Paras 11, 12)

Findings of Court:
The Court determined that BTPL did not sufficiently establish claims for an interim measure, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Issues: The main issues included the interpretation of contractual rights concerning damage recovery and the necessity of a prima facie case for interim measures.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court reasoned that damages under Article 15.8 do not require preliminary remedial action by NHAI for recovery and emphasized that the contractual language did not restrict recovery to undisputed sums.

Result: Petition dismissed, along with pending application.

Table of Content
1. factual background on contract dispute (Para 2)
2. arguments by btpl regarding contractual obligations (Para 3)
3. nhai's counterarguments on contractual terms (Para 4 , 5)
4. court's analysis of contract provisions (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
5. court's dismissal of btpl's petition (Para 11)
6. final conclusion and dismissal (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

[VIA HYBRID MODE]

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--The present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter, "the Act"] has been filed seeking interim measures pending constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal against coercive recovery by NHAI towards damages due to failure of repair and maintenance work on project assets.

THE DISPUTE

2. The facts leading to the present petition are as follows:

2.1. Petitioner-Bamanbore Tollway Private Ltd. [hereinafter, "BTPL"] and Respondent No. 1-National Highways Authority of India [hereinafter, "NHAI"] entered into a Concession Agreement dated 26th April, 2018 inter alia for `Tolling, Operation, Management, Maintenance & Transfer of National Highway stretch of Bamanbore to Garamore Section (from km 182+600 to km 254+537) of NH8A' [hereinafter, `Project Highway'] in Gujarat on a Toll-Operate-Transfer (`TOT') Basis for a period of 30 years.

2.2. Pursuant to a joint-inspection carried out on 25th April, 2020 along with representatives of BTPL, the Independent Engineer [hereinafter, "IE"], vide letter dated 27th April, 2020, listed out defects in the work that required repair and maintenance. Subsequently the damages were quantified and proposed at Rs.1,55,652/- in compliance with Article 15.8.1(b) of the Concessionaire Agreement. This was followed by another communication dated 18th August, 2020, wherein the IE, pursuant to inspection carried out at the project site on 12th August, 2020, listed out further defects. On the basis of said defects, the IE proposed that damages under Clause 15.8.1(b) be fixed at Rs.2 lacs per day, till the repair work was completed by BTPL.

2.3. BTPL responded to the afore-noted communications vide letter dated 24th August, 2020 contending that defects had been rectified. It submitted a compliance report to that effect, enclosing photographs of repairs carried out. In the meantime, NHAI on 31st March, 2021, on basis of the letter of IE proposing the damages, called upon the Petitioner to make a payment of Rs.4,09,55,652/- as per Article 15.8.1. BTPL vide letters dated 7th April, 2021 and 9th June, 2021, refuted all allegations levelled against it in detail, and also called upon NHAI to withdraw the Demand Notice dated 19th June, 2020.

2.4. NHAI issued an escrow invocation letter dated 2nd November, 2021 threatening recovery of an amount of Rs.4,09,55,652/- from an escrow account No. 038305001943 maintained by BTPL at ICICI Bank, Chembur Basant Cinema Branch, Mumbai.

2.5. In this background, BTPL has filed the present petition seeking interim protection of restraining NHAI from coercive recovery of damages from the aforesaid escrow account or such other means.

3. Mr. Nakul Dewan, Senior Counsel for BTPL, states that the action of NHAI is completely arbitrary and unreasonable, and makes the following submissions:

3.1. The action of NHAI for recovering damages from the escrow account is contrary to contractual terms. NHAI's right to remedial measures is stipulated under Article 15.9 of the Concessionaire Agreement, which reads as follows:

    "15.9 Authority's right to take remedial measures

    15.9.1 In the event the Concessionaire does not maintain and/or repair the Project Highway or any part thereof in conformity with the Maintenance Requirements, the Maintenance Manual or the Maintenance Programme or Safety Requirements, as the case may be, and fails to commence remedial works within 15 (fifteen) clays of receipt of the O&M Inspection Report or a notice in this behalf from the Authority or the Independent Engineer, as the case may be, the Authority shall, without prejudice to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top