SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Afroz Khan - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 14825 of 2021
Decided On : 22-12-2021




A writ petition challenging a dismissal order is subject to delay and lack of merit, particularly when filed decades after the event without substantial supporting evidence.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Right to Fair Procedure - The writ petition challenges the dismissal of the petitioner's father from service due to mental illness without a fair inquiry, raising issues of delay and lack of merit in seeking review after 28 years. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Delay and Laches - The court held that the petitioner's challenge to the dismissal order after a significant delay of over 28 years was untenable and dismissed the petition accordingly. (Paras 4-5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to challenge the dismissal of their father from the CRPF due to mental illness, claiming that proper procedure was not followed, but the petition was filed too long after the event.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petition was non-justiciable due to excessive delay as well as lack of substantial evidence regarding the father’s mental state at the time of dismissal.

Issues: The primary issues included the validity of the dismissal order, the delay in challenging it, and the applicable consideration for compassionate appointments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the challenge to the dismissal order was time-barred, and the claim regarding mental illness lacked contemporaneous support, leading to dismissal on both merits and procedural grounds.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. writ petition challenging father's dismissal. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding dismissal and mental illness. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's view on challenge and evidence. (Para 4)
4. writ petition dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

C.M.No.46711/2021

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 14825/2021

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the dismissal of Petitioner's father from the CRPF on 09th October, 1993. Petitioner also seeks directions to the Respondents to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 04th December 2017 for grant of pensionary and other benefits to the petitioner's mother as well as for appointment of Petitioner on compassionate ground.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner's father was dismissed from CRPF w.e.f. 09th October 1993, due to the mental illness of Chronic Schizophrenia. He states that the Petitioner's father was dismissed without conducting a fair enquiry and on the grounds of overstaying leave. He points out that the Respondents failed to acknowledge the mental illness of the Petitioner's father while passing the dismissal order against him.

3. He states that the Petitioner's mother preferred a representation dated 31st August 1995 seeking her compassionate appointment. However, the Respondents communicated vide response dated October 1997, that since the Petitioner's father was dismissed from service after a departmental enquiry, it was not possible to consider her for compassionate appointment.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and having perused the paper book, this Court is of the view that the Petitioner's cannot challenge the dismissal order of his father after lapse of more than twenty eight years. Further, the alibi of the Petitioner that his father was mentally disturbed when he was removed from service in 1993 does not inspire confidence, as the Petitioner was born (according to the affidavit in support of the petition) after the date of his father's dismissal from service. In any event, the Petitioner's case that his father was mentally disturbed on the date of his dismissal is not supported by any contemporaneous document.

5. Consequently, the present writ petition being bereft of merit is dismissed both on account of delay, laches as well as merit.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top