SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Sanjeev Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Nature Enterprises – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)--This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 03rd February, 2021 passed by the Court of Civil Judge-01, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in civil suit being CS SCJ No.521/2020, whereby unconditional leave to defend has been granted in favour of the respondent/defendant (hereinafter `respondent').

2. Notice was issued in the said petition on 28th July, 2021and the suit proceedings were stayed. On the next date of hearing, parties were granted liberty to file written submissions in respect of the issue in the present petition. Both the parties have filed written submissions.

3. Before dealing with the contentions of the parties, it is deemed appropriate to detail the facts preceding the filing of the present petition.

3.1. The suit from which the present petition arises was filed by the petitioner/plaintiff (hereinafter `petitioner') against the respondent under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.1,94,586/-.

3.2. Summons were issued in the suit on 10th July, 2020 and the respondent entered appearance.

3.3. In August, 2020, the petitioner filed affidavit under Order XX

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top