Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Bhikam Masih – Appellant
Versus
Trig Detectives Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural default due to absence (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. no mala fide intention to mislead (Para 5) |
| 3. poor person's medical condition affects litigation (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court diary errors should not penalize litigants (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. restoration of claim petition warranted (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. disposition of petition and communication of order (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.
2. None appears for the Respondent/Management. Counter affidavit has also not yet been filed. It is noticed from the record that the Respondent had entered appearance on 6th March, 2020, and thereafter, has not appeared at all in this matter. Vide order dated 25th January, 2021, the right to file the counter affidavit was closed by the Registrar. Despite the same, one more opportunity was thereafter granted, vide order dated 10th March, 2021. Even so, none is appearing on behalf of the Respondent and counter affidavit has not been filed.
3. Mr. Khan, ld. Counsel appearing for the Petitioner/Workman submits that the Workman in this case had filed his claim against the Respondent/Management. However, due to certain reasons, h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
