SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Hunch Circle Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Futuretimes Technology India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

(By Video Conference on account of COVID-19)

1. These petitions have been preferred under Section 11(6) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("the 1996 Act"), seeking reference of the disputes between the parties to arbitration.

2. The contract between the petitioner and the respondent, whereunder reference to arbitration is sought, contains, inter alia, the following Clauses:

    "8.1. Governing Law

    This Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be governed by and construed under the Laws of India without regard to conflicts of Laws provisions. Subject to resolution of disputes by arbitration, courts at the place where the Main Premises is located will have exclusive supervisory jurisdiction over matters arising out of this Agreement, especially for granting interim relief and enforcing arbitral awards.

    8.2. Arbitration

    Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or in relation to this Agreement, or at Law, or the breach, termination or invalidity of this Agreement, that cannot be settled amicably by agreement of the Parties to this Agreement shall be finally settled by arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top