DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Zreyah Semiconductors Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
1. The present petition has been filed by petitioner seeking appointment of Sole Arbitrator under the provisions of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
2. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the respondent had submitted that the matter can be resolved outside court. However, learned counsel for the petitioner today submits that matter could not be settled and therefore, the present petition be heard and allowed.
3. Petitioner company is registered under the Companies Act, 2013 and is engaged in the business of managing hospitality establishments and claims to be world's leading chain of hotels, homes, and spaces. The premise of the present petition is Vendor Agreement dated 23.12.2019 entered with respondent for the purpose of purchase of electronic components and products as detailed in Schedule-A of the Vendor Agreement.
4. According to petitioner, in terms of the Vendor Agreement dated 23.12.2019, petitioner placed an order for 52,360 switches for an amount of INR. 10,34,89,540/-, payment for which was to be made within 30 days of receipt of undisputed invoices, subject to Clause 3.2 of the Vendor Agreement, which specif
Disputes arising from defective goods supplied are arbitrable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and an arbitrator can be appointed for resolution per the terms of the underlying purchase or....
In the absence of opposition, a court may appoint an arbitrator based on deemed service through electronic means for resolving contractual disputes.
Court may appoint a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act when parties fail to respond to dispute communications.
The court can appoint an Arbitrator when parties fail to mutually agree, as per agreement provisions and arbitration law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes between....
The main legal principle established is the enforceability of arbitration clauses in contracts and the court's authority to appoint a Sole Arbitrator to resolve disputes in accordance with the Arbitr....
The court granted the petition for arbitration appointment, emphasizing the respondent's refusal to engage and affirming jurisdiction based on the terms in the invoice.
The court ruled that a party's failure to comply with a contractual agreement justifies the appointment of an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, validating service via multiple de....
Court can appoint a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with mutual consent of the parties for efficient dispute resolution.
Appointment of an arbitrator is essential when disputes arise from contractual agreements and non-compliance with demand notices, reinforcing the obligations under the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.