SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Zreyah Semiconductors Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed by petitioner seeking appointment of Sole Arbitrator under the provisions of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the respondent had submitted that the matter can be resolved outside court. However, learned counsel for the petitioner today submits that matter could not be settled and therefore, the present petition be heard and allowed.

3. Petitioner company is registered under the Companies Act, 2013 and is engaged in the business of managing hospitality establishments and claims to be world's leading chain of hotels, homes, and spaces. The premise of the present petition is Vendor Agreement dated 23.12.2019 entered with respondent for the purpose of purchase of electronic components and products as detailed in Schedule-A of the Vendor Agreement.

4. According to petitioner, in terms of the Vendor Agreement dated 23.12.2019, petitioner placed an order for 52,360 switches for an amount of INR. 10,34,89,540/-, payment for which was to be made within 30 days of receipt of undisputed invoices, subject to Clause 3.2 of the Vendor Agreement, which specif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top