Anu Rajotia vs Rita Allahabadi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Anu Rajotia – Appellant
Versus
Rita Allahabadi – Respondent

Table of Content
1. trial court orders restraining respondent (Para 2)
2. appellant claims ownership as previous tenant (Para 3 , 4)
3. proceedings on application under order xii rule 6 (Para 5)
4. adjusted orders on occupation charges and rights (Para 6 , 8)
5. finalization of appeal and court orders (Para 9 , 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Appellant impugns order dated 19.02.2021, whereby the trial court has restrained the respondent from creating any third party rights in suit property, parting with possession of the same or raising any unauthorized construction. Appellant further impugns order dated 04.09.2021, whereby appellant has been directed to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- per month as use and occupation charges with effect from 01.02.2020.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though appellant was inducted as a tenant but appellant is now an owner of the subject property as appellant had paid the entire sale consideration to the erstwhile owner in the year 2006 and agreement to sell etc. was executed in his favour.

4. He, however, without prejudice submits that appellant shall deposit with the tr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document