SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TALWANT SINGH
Devendra – Appellant
Versus
NDMC – Respondent


Table of Content
1. delay in filing writ petition (Para 2 , 3)
2. writ petition dismissed due to delays (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's reasoning on jurisdiction for delay (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

[Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)--We had heard the matter at some length on the previous date i.e., 11.01.2022. After hearing Mr Ujjwal Goel, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the said date, the following was recorded:

    "2. This is a writ petition directed against the order dated 07.09.2018, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [in short "the Tribunal"] in O.A.No.10/2016.

    3. First and foremost, we are unable to gather as to why there has been a delay in bringing up the present writ petition.

    3.1. Mr. Ujjwal Goel, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, says that the writ petition was filed on 07.03.2019. There is, however, nothing on record to show that the writ petition was filed on 07.03.2019.

    3.2. According to Mr. Goel, upon filing the writ petition, diary no.211540 was allocated to the matter by the Registry.

    3.3. The Registry will submit a report as to when the writ petition was filed, in the first instance.

    4. That apart

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top